3rubric

3Rubric

ASSESSED** ||  **Beginning**  ||  **Developing**  ||  **Proficient**  ||  **Strong**  ||  **SCORE** ** 40pts ** || **WEIGHT**  ||  **MARK**  || (apply)**// || RA paper  makes no reference to the issues of rhetoric (esp. ethos, pathos, & logos) talked about in the class notes/lectures and does not quote from the material under analysis. || RA paper makes some reference to the issues of rhetoric (esp. ethos, pathos, & logos) talked about in the class notes/lectures and quotes from the material under analysis but these quotes don't always support the conclusions made in the paper. || RA paper demonstrates engagement with most of the issues of rhetoric (esp. ethos, pathos, & logos) talked about in the class notes/lectures, quotes from the material under analysis, and makes a fair case for why the material is or is not an effective piece of rhetoric. || RA paper demonstrates engagement with the important issues of rhetoric (esp. ethos, pathos, & logos) talked about in the class notes/lectures, quotes extensively from the material under analysis, and makes a good case for why the material is or is not an effective piece of rhetoric. || 12 || 30% ||  || //**(organize)**//  || RA paper   does not present the parts of a RA paper and is generally disorganized and off topic. || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper  does a fair job of presenting the parts of a RA paper but neglects one area or another. The paper is somewhat disorganized. || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper  does a good job of presenting the parts of a RA paper: identifies the audience, demonstrates the piece's rhetorical strategies, and justifies the analysis produced. || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper  does an excellent job of presenting the parts of a RA paper: identifies the audience, demonstrates the piece's rhetorical strategies, and justifies the analysis produced. || 12 || 30% ||  ||
 * **OUTCOME
 * ^  ||  1 -3  ||  4-6  ||  7-8  ||  9-10  ||^   ||^   ||^   ||
 * //**Overall Understanding of the Informative Essay-xx (define)**// || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper does not exhibit an understanding of t<span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">he elements of rhetoric. Context and audience for the selected material are not enumerated.   || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper exhibits a fair understanding of <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">the elements of rhetoric. Context and audience for the selected material are not quite clear.   || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper exhibits a good understanding of <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">the elements of rhetoric including context and audience.   || <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">RA paper exhibits an excellent understanding of <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">the elements of rhetoric  including a thorough presentation of context and audience.  || 12 || 30% ||   ||
 * //**Intellectual Engagement with Key Concepts in xx
 * //**Written Response Laying out Key Sections of the Reported Material**//
 * //**Engaged Writing**// || RA paper uses incorrect grammar and syntax consistently, making it difficult for others to follow. <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">No revision is demonstrated between the rd and fd.  ||  RA paper demonstrates some evidence of correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Readers will have little trouble reading your paper. <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Minor revision is demonstrated between the rd and fd. ||   RA paper  shows a good command of Standard English. No problems for your readers. Style shows some flair for language. <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Some revision is demonstrated between the rd and fd. ||   RA paper   <span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">shows an excellent command of Standard English and exhibits a flair for language and an original style. Significant revision is demonstrated between the rd and fd. || 4 || 10% ||   ||
 * Modified from a rubric found at http://www.catholic-forum.com/churches/cathteach/outcomes_rubric_reflection_journal.html ||